-
Website
http://bravenewfilms.org/ -
Original page
http://new.bravenewfilms.org/blog/?p=5301 -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Craig_Sipple1
850 comments · 2 points
-
KeltCindy
10 comments · 1 points
-
grinrevere
8 comments · 1 points
-
ThisCanadian
15 comments · 1 points
-
NER
7 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Afghanistan Escalation Will (and Should) Hurt Congressional Democrats in 2010
2 days ago · 1 comment
-
A Sad Farewell to My Friend, Deborah Yesner
3 days ago · 1 comment
-
New York Poised to Drill, Baby, Drill
2 weeks ago · 1 comment
-
A Different Kind Of Tears For Obama
4 weeks ago · 2 comments
-
Time to Stand Up
3 weeks ago · 1 comment
-
Afghanistan Escalation Will (and Should) Hurt Congressional Democrats in 2010
1. We ARE in debt for a mulititude of reasons...one being education as well.
2. No one I know personally in this country so childlishly agreed with going to war with a mission to simply "kill people".
3. The government is not responsible for New Orleans. Its people are. Throwing money at situations is not the final answer.
4. What is your alternative spending plan to deal with people whose purpose in life is to kill you and me?
Your slogan, "They Distort. We Reply." is laughable. Funny, its the first thing I thought about your "FOX Attacks the Environment" video...its distorted! I watch that video and see a beatiful thing: OPINION! Opinions expressed by guests on the show...and QUESTIONS asked by TV broadcasters. Seems like a very level-headed approach to a news cable station to me! Far more balanced then many medias we-hate-all-things-conservative and we-know-better-then-anyone approach to me!
Blessings!
Alexander
TheScroogeReport.com
2. Why did we really attach Iraq?
Was it to insure that terrorists could no longer use Iraq as a training facility? No, there are more Al-Qaida operatives in Iraq now than before we attacked.
WMD's? No inspectors on the ground with access to whatever they wanted to see said there were no WMD's.
They were trying to purchase anthrax? No that statement by Mr. Powell was proven to be false.
Why? GREED. No bid contracts gave billions of OUR money away. 4 billion dollars cash, shipped to Iraq with NO accountability. Get real. The only purpose of this administration is to make themselves richer. Everything else they do is an attempt to ensure the perpetuation of the power they wield to continue to steal money from the American People.
3. The government through the use of the Army Corp of Engineers is responsible to protect the City of New Orleans from hurricanes. If the levies had been built to withstand a category 5 hurricane the damage to New Orleans would not have been anywhere near as devastating.
4. Anyone with any sense of the Almighty God in Heaven would be aware that no one in creation's sole purpose in life is to kill you or me. There have always been those who will hate and despise America and there always will be. Attacking other countries is not the way to deal with those people. Quite the opposite.
Here's an idea on how to stop mid-east terrorists. Stop funding them. This country should strive to be energy independent. We should be trying to find ways to reduce our energy consumption and stop driving up the price of oil making countries that sponsor terrorist activities wealthy enough to give money away to these kinds of organizations.
Why doesn't the current administration see that? Why don't they want the price of oil to come down? Follow the money.
Alexander, May God Almighty in Heaven, The One True God, Creator of All Things, see fit to open your eyes and your heart so that you may work for the betterment of Creation.
Bless you one and all.
RN
Sources please? This is total, total news to me. ALL my life I have been taught that the government is always operating with a negative balance. You must have not included the national debt.
As for pulling out the troops, it will only end up costing us more because the US isn't going to give up that oil nor the power of having presense in that region. Less military means more contractors from all over the world getting paid far better than our troops and even less accountability due to the lack of laws governing these folks and the ease of which these folks can be lost in the system.
Thanks for that educational tidbit. Maybe we should eliminate all educational spending so we can dump more money into Iraq!
2. No one I know personally in this country so childishly agreed with going to war with a mission to simply "kill people".
You're right. There was the killing people part, but also the protecting oil part. Also the 'completing daddy's unfinished business' part.
3. The government is not responsible for New Orleans. Its people are. Throwing money at situations is not the final answer.
Unless it's throwing money at Iraq. See, spending more money to rebuild New Orleans is wrong, whereas spending billions to rebuild [sic] Iraq is patriotic. Seriously, how do you socialist liberals not GET that???
4. What is your alternative spending plan to deal with people whose purpose in life is to kill you and me?
Hear hear! I mean, what do you liberals propose, fully funding the 9/11 Commission recommendations? Border security? Upgraded communication systems for police and fire departments? That's just throwing money at the problem.
They grossly failed in their responsibility to properly DESIGN the levee in the first place. And they failed to respond to the problems, years before the hurricane, and years after they had been made aware of the problems.
So, this is irresponsibility on the federal governments part for which they should rightfully be held accountable.
By the way, their failures cost me $297,000 personally and many others a lot more than that.
Jeffrey
We interrupt this NASCAR event to bring you this important message.... The polar ice caps are melting, uncovering serious deposits of oil! Also, a massive terrorist cell, larger than any in Iraq, found in Greenland. U.S. troops are on the way!!!!
Again I hear only silence...
http://kucinich.us/
Again I hear only silence..."
---------------------
HEY! IS THIS LOUD ENOUGH FOR YOU?
Your President Bush has full economic control of the most dangerous military on Earth and he is not afraid to use it for his own purposes. Standing up to the Man and his filthy rich corporate friends is dangerous to say the least. Also, a great many hypocritical new car owners are keeping extreemly silent on the whole issue.
Regarding your earlier post, "Sources please? This is total, total news to me. ALL my life I have been taught that the government is always operating with a negative balance. You must have not included the national debt," according to the Congressional Budget Office, under the Clinton administration, the United States had a projected federal budget surplus for the first time since 1969. Here's a link so you can see for yourself:
http://www.cbo.gov/budget/historical.pdf
i just want to tell you that all the people always ask WHY? the reason is very simple, USA is full of low educated people, and the ones with good education and oportunities, have the money to just dont care about. Middle class are going to be like pandas in 20 years, and the ones who "care about", are too lazy to do something real strong to make them hear....so what we reaaaaaally need is a big rock coming really quick, the only problem is that halliburton is going to rebuild the planet...and here we go again.