Brave New Films: How Obama Can Help Avoid Another Abu Ghraib
williecoyote
· 3 months ago
There is a limit what could be asked from a soldier. Beyond that limit starts "black" zone, merceneries and private "security" forces.
Mercs and private thugs are in it for money, so it is safe to make an presumption that their employers are also in it for money, or profit to be more precise.
If those figures above are acurate, and I think so, are those mercenaries, private security and other thugs incorporated into chain of command, or they act independently of HQ?
If they are incorporated in chain of command then we have a clear situation who is responsible.
If they are not, then there is a strange situation where those paramilitary forces are illegaly on soil of other country, and therefore, they may be considered as terorists, funded and brought to theatre of operations by US government, which did not have any legal right to do so.
Either way, who is responsible for their actions?
whitetailslayer
· 2 months ago
im sorry i missed the part where you assholes told me why kbr and the u s army shot and killed my brother donald e tolfree jr in cold blood in balad iraq on 5 feb 07 fuck you assholes who are trying to make a killing off my brothers killing ill see you mother fuckers in hell and you know who you are matches you shot my brother to death and you dont have the goddamm decencey to talk to me and tell me why i hope you meet the same fate as my brother you fucking punk fuck you and the u s army you fucking murderers
All Comments
Mercs and private thugs are in it for money, so it is safe to make an presumption that their employers are also in it for money, or profit to be more precise.
If those figures above are acurate, and I think so, are those mercenaries, private security and other thugs incorporated into chain of command, or they act independently of HQ?
If they are incorporated in chain of command then we have a clear situation who is responsible.
If they are not, then there is a strange situation where those paramilitary forces are illegaly on soil of other country, and therefore, they may be considered as terorists, funded and brought to theatre of operations by US government, which did not have any legal right to do so.
Either way, who is responsible for their actions?