-
Website
http://bravenewfilms.org/ -
Original page
http://new.bravenewfilms.org/blog/?p=5335 -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Craig_Sipple1
850 comments · 2 points
-
KeltCindy
10 comments · 1 points
-
grinrevere
8 comments · 1 points
-
ThisCanadian
15 comments · 1 points
-
NER
7 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Afghanistan Escalation Will (and Should) Hurt Congressional Democrats in 2010
2 days ago · 1 comment
-
A Sad Farewell to My Friend, Deborah Yesner
3 days ago · 1 comment
-
New York Poised to Drill, Baby, Drill
2 weeks ago · 1 comment
-
A Different Kind Of Tears For Obama
4 weeks ago · 2 comments
-
Time to Stand Up
3 weeks ago · 1 comment
-
Afghanistan Escalation Will (and Should) Hurt Congressional Democrats in 2010
Do the rest of USA a favor, get out of this country because you are all unamerican.
Thanks for the advice though. Always nice to be told I am un-American by someone who is too stupid to even know you capitalize the A in American.
Imbecile.
How, exactly, does one become "carried away" reporting "just the facts"? Oh, I know how. One lies!
How brain dead to you have to be to not see through Billo's pompous buffoonery? As brain dead as "unlib" I guess.
Darwin never claimed evolution was perfect.
The insipid response from the right to nearly anything they don't understand lands you in the halls of communisim. This reaction, of course, gets stunted upon the discovery that many relatives or friends of these cretins are less right and more central or left of insanity than they are. It puts them back in that emotional diaper to which they are more accustomed to an comfortable in.
Why do organizations like GLAAD continue to lend credibility to Fox News by acknowledging their factless fake news as being worthy of response? By reacting, aren't they in essence simply feeding the frenzy?
My grandmother used to say that if you stop feeding stray cats, they will go away. Does that logic apply here as well? I'm not suggesting that GLAAD stop defending the rights of gays and lesbians. I just wouldn't do it on a show which I rank somewhere below Jerry Springer.
Either truly DEBATE/DISCUSS/ARGUE an issue or get off the air.
Please! There is no need to argue like this. I'll be off the site for a while, so write what I say among yourselves; in the film, Mister Bill O'Reilly is drawing a connection between homosexuality and the practice of forming criminal gangs. He is failing to identify the character of that connection, and he is also failing to remember that the singular of "phenomena" is "phenomenon". That is the problem. What is the answer?
FWIW, though I suppose it should be self-evident that this stuff is comic-book nonsense, the SPLC did bother to do a fact-check on this. I blogged about it as well.
I'm still agog at the depths that are being plumbed at Fox. Just when you thought they couldn't top themselves, they do.
You gotta love how your first commenter reflexively goes into eliminationist mode. It's like they're not even going to bother arguing anymore, because really they can't.
It would be nice to loose my job, whatever that means. I am employed, but only allowed part-taim hours, or they'll have to pay for HEALTH BENEFITS.
I wish Phillip's granma had been invited on. SOMEBODY OUGHT to quote her, and use metaphor to call O'REALLY? a stray cat.
"I'm not going to try to speak over your ranting in order to answer the question you asked for mere show."
"Is this how your mother taught you to treat a guest? Do you GET any home-training?"
"Oh, please. Can you think of something intelligent tosay or a reasonable, germane question to ask?"
"Can you please stick to facts and actual statistics, not the false impressions of the ignorant and emotionally unstable, and Big Brother's propaganda?"
"Would you please reflect quietly on the ridiculousness of that last position before asking me to waste my time refuting the ridiculous and obviously untenable?"
Just a few suggestions for anyone contemplating going on the show.
No, IT isn't. Phenomena is a singular noun. If only you knew enough about editorial practice to even speak the language correctly, but that would be flattering you by according the respect of a journalist, not a risqué novelist.
You should realize Communist China is not very liberal. In fact, there's a distortion of truth in the media there as it is controlled by the government. Sound familiar? Perhaps you Fox lovers should live there where the deluded mindset is well supported!
He spouts hatred and false information, he is a troubled soul.
Just wondering... guess I missed something... what does walking past felafel stands have to do with the price of tea in China? (Allusions to China seems to be a favorite here)
My question is: If Billo wants to call out gangs in America, why doesn't he do it to the biggest criminal gang in our country right now?
"The Loyal Bushies"...
Oh, wait... Bill's on FOX "news" isn't he? DAMN! That's right... You don't want to call out your own "gang". That kind o' $h!t'll git yoo delt wit!!!
Typical O'Reilly here.
Still a punk-ass-ratings-grubbing-chump.
They call themselved "the oriellys".